Pevita Pearce
The United States’ immigration system for highly skilled professionals is undergoing its most significant transformation in decades, with new regulations for the H-1B visa program set to take effect this month. This annual lottery, a critical pathway for white-collar workers seeking to build careers in the U.S., now incorporates substantial changes, including a new $100,000 fee for successful foreign-sponsored immigrants and a prioritization of more experienced and higher-paid workers. These adjustments are anticipated to disproportionately affect IT consulting firms, which have historically secured a significant portion of these coveted visas.
As the H-1B lottery opens, employers, legal experts, and staffing agencies are meticulously analyzing the revised framework to maximize their chances of securing one of the 85,000 available slots, awarded annually by the end of March. In the preceding year, approximately one-third of all petitions were successful, highlighting the intense competition for these limited opportunities.
"This is going to be a bit of a sea change," commented Peter Bendor-Samuel, executive chairman of global research firm Everest Group. Bendor-Samuel, whose firm advises companies that frequently utilize the H-1B program, suggests that the substantial $100,000 fee for overseas workers may deter staffing firms, potentially freeing up visa allocations for U.S.-based technology and finance companies that are better positioned to absorb such costs.
Shifting Landscape for H-1B Visas
The H-1B visa program has long been a cornerstone for attracting foreign talent, particularly in the technology sector. Major corporations such as Amazon, Google, and Microsoft have been prominent users of the H-1B visa, alongside large outsourcing and placement firms like Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, and Cognizant Technology Solutions. These staffing companies have cultivated a profitable niche by recruiting programmers and other specialized technology professionals from abroad, subsequently placing them with U.S. clients across diverse industries, including finance and healthcare.
However, these staffing firms have increasingly come under scrutiny in Washington. Labor advocates and a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers have voiced concerns that these companies may suppress wages or limit employment opportunities for American workers. In response, these firms maintain that they adhere to U.S. regulations and utilize the H-1B visa to fill critical, specialized roles that cannot be readily filled by the domestic workforce.
Even before the implementation of the latest policy changes, many consulting firms had begun to reduce their reliance on the H-1B program due to the growing complexity and unpredictability of the immigration system, according to Rod Bourgeois, managing partner at DeepDive Equity Research. Bourgeois, who works closely with such firms and is knowledgeable about their staffing strategies, anticipates that these companies will increasingly focus on overseas placements.
Cognizant, a global IT services and consulting firm, exemplifies this trend, having already reduced its dependence on H-1B visas. A spokesperson for Cognizant, Jeff DeMarrais, stated that the new H-1B filing fee is expected to have a "limited near-term impact." The company now primarily leverages the program for "select technology roles that supplement our U.S. workforce." Tata Consultancy Services and Infosys did not respond to requests for comment regarding their strategies for the upcoming visa lottery.
The Impact of New Fees and Prioritization
The introduction of the $100,000 fee, implemented through an executive order in September, is a direct response to concerns about alleged abuses of the H-1B system that purportedly undermine U.S. wages and job prospects. This fee is specifically applicable to immigrants sponsored by their overseas employers.
Furthermore, the Department of Homeland Security announced a significant shift in the lottery’s mechanics last year: the system now assigns preferential odds to applicants who command higher salaries. Candidates are categorized into one of four tiers based on their proposed wage relative to prevailing wages for similar positions in their specific industry and geographic location. This change is designed to favor those filling jobs that offer compensation above the regional average.
The implications of these new regulations are already being felt by businesses. Mara Roitman, vice president of human resources at True Religion, a Los Angeles-based apparel manufacturer, shared her company’s recent experience. True Religion sought to fill a senior director of production and sourcing position and identified a highly qualified candidate from Guatemala who required a work visa. Under the new H-1B rules, sponsoring this candidate would have incurred the $100,000 fee. "We will not seek an H-1B for a role if we have to pay $100,000," Roitman stated, emphasizing that "It’s a lot of money."
The company explored alternative visa options, including the O-1 visa for individuals with extraordinary ability, but their application was denied by federal authorities. This has led True Religion to restart its search for a suitable candidate, highlighting the practical challenges imposed by the revised H-1B framework.
Broader Implications and Future Uncertainty
The future of the $100,000 fee itself remains subject to uncertainty, as the executive order that established it is slated to expire in October. As of now, there has been no official announcement regarding plans for its renewal, adding another layer of complexity for businesses reliant on foreign talent.
Beyond federal regulations, some states have begun to implement their own restrictions on H-1B hiring at public institutions. On Monday, the board overseeing Florida’s public universities voted to freeze the hiring of H-1B visa holders for the current year. This decision will remain in effect while officials assess whether the universities’ past utilization of the program has negatively impacted American workers. This action follows a similar move by Texas state officials in January, who banned H-1B hiring at public universities and state agencies until at least May 31, 2027.
For technology startups, the cumulative effect of these H-1B lottery and application process changes, coupled with a broader immigration crackdown from the Trump administration, is likely to make acquiring the necessary talent for growth and innovation more challenging. Rahul Gudise, CEO of Gale, a company that assists clients with work-based immigration processes, believes this will impact early-stage companies. "Many of them often have a specific person or skill set they want to hire in their early stages because it’s instrumental to how your company forms," Gudise explained. "It’s going to set the tone of what you’re building."
Hiba Anver, a partner at Erickson Immigration Group, which advises tech companies on hiring foreign-born workers, anticipates that the revised H-1B fees and the narrowing of legal immigration pathways will have long-term consequences for U.S. businesses. "There are several changes that taken collectively will diminish the tech industry’s ability to attract and retain key talent," Anver stated. She concluded that this ultimately "will result in a smaller talent pool for tech companies."
Historical Context and Data
The H-1B visa program was established in 1990 through the Immigration Act of 1990, designed to allow U.S. employers to temporarily employ foreign workers in specialty occupations requiring theoretical or technical expertise. The program has a congressionally mandated annual cap of 85,000 visas, which includes 65,000 regular visas and an additional 20,000 visas set aside for individuals with a U.S. master’s degree or higher.
Over the years, the H-1B program has been a subject of intense debate. Critics argue that it has been exploited by some companies to hire lower-cost foreign labor, potentially displacing American workers and suppressing wages. Data from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has shown a consistent oversubscription of the annual cap, with the number of petitions far exceeding the available slots, necessitating a lottery system for selection.
For instance, in fiscal year 2023, USCIS received approximately 780,000 H-1B petitions for the regular cap, far exceeding the 65,000 available slots. This highlights the immense demand and the competitive nature of the lottery even before the recent policy shifts.
The recent executive order that introduced the $100,000 fee was signed by President Trump in September, aiming to address perceived imbalances in the program. The administration cited concerns that the H-1B system was being used in ways that undercut American workers and wages. This move signaled a broader effort by the administration to re-evaluate and, in some cases, restrict immigration pathways, particularly for skilled workers.
The shift towards prioritizing higher salaries is also a notable change. Historically, while salary was a factor, the new tiered system introduces a more direct and impactful incentive for employers to offer competitive compensation to foreign-born workers. This could lead to a situation where highly skilled individuals in high-demand, high-paying fields are more likely to secure H-1B visas, while those in mid-level or lower-paying specialty occupations may face greater challenges.
The reactions from industry stakeholders underscore the significant adjustments companies must now navigate. The increased financial burden and the altered selection criteria present new strategic considerations for businesses looking to leverage global talent. The long-term effects of these changes will likely shape the U.S. innovation landscape and the ability of American companies to attract and retain top international talent.
The ongoing developments, including the potential expiration of the executive order and state-level interventions, suggest a dynamic and evolving immigration policy environment. Businesses and legal professionals will need to remain vigilant and adapt to these changes to effectively manage their workforce needs and contribute to the U.S. economy.
With assistance from Andrew Kreighbaum, Eric Fan and Newley Purnell.
Photo credit: filo/iStock
©2026 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency LLC.
